Simon Cowell of Jewish pedigree
Did you know that Simon Cowell, the acerbic judge on American Idol, is half-Jewish?
British Jews keep a low profile but they are extremely influential. Similarly, it is hardly known that the British aristocracy largely is half-Jewish too, and that, in the words of L.G. Pine, Editor of Burke’s Peerage, “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.” (219)
This is confirmed by British social critic Hilaire Belloc who described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.
“After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical.” (“The Jews” 1922)
In the next few articles, I am going to explore the thesis that the British Empire was a Masonic proxy, and that British & American imperialism derived its moxie from the perverse desire of Cabalist bankers to own and control everything. The Illuminati bankers (i.e. the “Crown”) colonized England & the US as well as the world. The “Jewish Conspiracy” was the British Empire now repackaged as the New World Order. Of course, now it encompasses everyone with a stake in “globalism.”
Before I commence this heavy lifting, it being the weekend, I want to regale you with Pine’s amusing account of “Jewish infiltration into the aristocracy.” ( “The Anglo Jewish Peerage” in “Tales of the British Aristocracy” 1956, pp.217-223.)
Pine is outspoken in a way few people are today. He says that for every Rothschild or Disraeli, there were “10 cases of Jewish connection which are now forgotten. The reason is that in many cases “Jewish origin is concealed.” (218)
The marriage of Jewish finance and British aristocracy took place literally. Spendthrift gentry married the daughters of rich Jews.
Pine is scornful of the British aristocracy: “A man is not usually thought the more of, because he has married a woman for her money…An ancient estate is likely to be sold unless some large sums are found. The sums are found from marriage with a Jewish heiress…”
An outstanding example is the marriage of the 5th Earl of Roseberry who married the only daughter and heiress of Baron Mayer de Rothschild and later became Prime Minister. “She stayed in the Jewish religion but her children were educated as Christians…The alliances between Jewish ladies and British lords are mostly of this type, the wife providing large sums…while the aristocrat has the title and ancient estate. The children are able to look back upon a varied bag of ancestors.”
Pine obviously does not approve of these parvenus: “There can be no question that the British Peerage is now very much diluted with Jewish blood and has many connections among its most ancient and august families with those who only a few generations ago were inhabitants of the Ghetto.”
But he opines that England’s enfeebled elite may need this protection from the “forces of revolution”:
“The power of money is very great and as almost every liberal newspaper is under Jewish influence it follows that the forces of revolution when directed against the peers are likely to meet with as determined an opposition from the Jewish kinfolk of the aristocracy…”
L.G. Pine needn’t worry about the “forces of revolution” since they were created by Jewish finance to concentrate power and wealth in their own hands. This will find its apogee in the New World Order.
CONCLUSION
The “Jewish Conspiracy” may indeed be the British Empire, and the “Jews” may in fact be the Masonic British aristocracy who regard themselves as Jews, and often are. They consider themselves one of the lost tribes of Israel, the real “Chosen People.” The word “Brit” apparently derives from the Hebrew for “pact” or “covenant” ( i.e. the Jewish Covenant with God.) Members of the British royal family are circumcised by a Jewish mohel.
For the complete article at its source go to …
7 Comments
I’ve been researching this for awhile now and have come to the same conclusion as Hitler, that it is all Jews. According to this article, jon Bjerknes discusses the fact that it is not government that is the problem, but Jews in government and every other leadership role:
http://whitewraithe.wordpress.com/the-jewish-problem-new-essay-series-by-christopher-jon-bjerknes/
What are we to do with the Jews that are or have been crossed with non-Jews? Are they just as evil and if so, how in the heck will we distinguish? For that matter, how are we to know that we ourselves aren’t part Jewish?
You continue to show an article by Henry Makow on your page.Mr.Makow is himself a swiss born Canadian Jew (born 1949) who lives in Winnipeh, Canada. That article has a reference to Our website. It is erroneous and the author withdrew it within 48 hours, at our request. We believe in freedom of speech but do not believe that reference be made to our website. We therefore request that you remove reference to our Jewish Hall of Fame. This is a list of fine people who have contributed to all aspects of British life.
There may be a few isolated cases of Jews marrying into the British Aristocracy but on the whole those people are no longer considered as Jews. The Jewish religion unlike most others does not recruit and until the end of the 19th century no Jew could take public position or own land. Most of the Jews lived in poor conditions in the East End of London, Leeds, Glasgow or Manchester. At the peak there were only 450,000 Jews in England and today the figure is under 250,000 in a population of 65 million.
To our knowledge there is no Jewish connection to our royal family. The reason that a Rabbi circumcised royalty was the fact that they were the most experienced at this operation. There is an old saying that a “Manx cat is a cat without a tail, however it is not true that a cat without a tail is a Manx Cat”. It was on that sort of premise that Makow wrote his article. His ignorance of Britain was the reference to the Brits. He did not even know that the few Britons left live in Wales or Cornwall. This island was made up of Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Vikings and Normans.They expelled the Jews from England. So the only fact left was that Lord Rosebury married a Rothschild and they brought their children up as Christians.
We are sure you do not wish to be associated in continuing to publish these errors.
Cerdic Von Wessex
Editor
UK Informed Investor
I don’t doubt that the Jews listed on your Web page “have contributed to all aspects of British life” – wasn’t that precisely what Markow was saying?
But the Jews listed are hardly all “fine people”, and we’ve shown on this Weblog how not a few of them are among the vilest and most depraved, as the mug shots you’ve thrown up more than adequately testify to.
Here’s a link to your so-called “Jewish Hall of Fame” …
http://www.imo.1free.ws/hof.htm
Jews don’t like to recruit to their religion because they’re paranoid about ‘infil-traitors’ getting inside knowledge of what the Jews have been up to since they committed the crime of the Crucifixion.
I notice you neglected to tell us WHY the Jews couldn’t take a public position or own land for some time in England after the expulsion by Edward I in 1290. Was it not because they were quite unworthy of trust and militantly opposed to Christianity and the welfare of Gentiles – they were, after all, expelled from England because they had an obsession with usury and the ritual murder of Christians, and secretly plotted bloody revolution and the murder of monarchs.
Research indicates that there has been a pronounced Semitic – I do not say predominantly Jewish – pedigree in England’s royalty from the de facto reign of Matilda, empress of the kingdom of England, wife of Geoffrey of Anjou, and the mother of England’s Henry II.
Henry Markow is correct when he says the colloquialism “Brit” derives from a Jewish acronym for Britain (i.e., B’rithain) that celebrated the island of Britain as the Jews’ new promised land or ‘land of the covenant’ – c.f., B’nai B’rith means “sons of the covenant” – when the Jews in dispersion under the wrath of God for the crime of the Crucifixion had lost all hope that the land he gave to their patriarch Abraham by an everlasting covenant would ever be theirs to occupy and control again.
Even the name of the “Union Jack” is a cabbalistic allusion to the Jews’ anticipated union and consolidation of a remnant of the twelve tribes under a sympathetic Semitic ruler (‘Jewish’ Grail king) in England after they were let back into the country by Cromwell – “Jack” is cognate with “Jacob”, the patriarch and eponym of the nation of Israel.
The “Crown” of the former British colonies and the 53 states of Commonwealth countries is hardly the crown of England’s monarch incumbent, and is the superior ‘Arthurian’ Crown (seat and legal embodiment) of the private sovereignty of the City of London, which is with a board of Jews and their acolytes – mostly banksters – who are accountable to what’s known colloquially as the Rothschild tribunal.
Whilst it is our policy not to argue about politics or religion we DO argue about facts. The reader above laughingly mistakes the difference between the Union Flag and the Union Jack. The Union “Jack” refers to the flagpole which the union flag is mounted upon.
Markow has tried to say that a great many of the British Aristocracy has Jewish blood in them. This is what we do not agree with. It is true that many of them were prepared to do business with Jewish people. We believe he confused the “acceptance” of Jews in England with some sort of mass intermarriage. Examples of such intermarriage was so rare that, as with the Earl of Rosebury, it was commented upon.
The expulsion in 1390 was stirred up by ignorant people being given erroneous facts by agitators. Thankfully to-day these type of people are seen for what they are by the public at whole. Because of mass communication thinking people can now check up on the real facts and don’t have to believe outdated prejudices.
The theory that Cromwell “let the Jews back in” is also erroneous- it is true he wished to but parliament didn’t agree, then it was discovered that the expulsion only referred to the Jews who were in England in 1290 and that there was no ban on others coming in.The laws of ownership in land and of position in England stems from the banning of Catholics not the Jews but covered all people who did not believe in the the divine right of the King of England.
We do not understand the word banksters. However the main clearing house banks in England- Barclays, Lloyds, Martins, Nat West and HSBC were never “Jewish”. You are again, it appears, referring to a minority of 19th century merchant banks like Rothschilds, Warbergs, and Schroeders who grew out of their connections in other European Countries and are today very small fish in a large ocean.
As we said we believe in free speech and facts. Not fairy tales made up by word similarities. We are all human beings and in every race and religion there are good and bad. As long as the good can prevail mankind has a future. If however the bad prevail then who knows what the future will be. Do you not realise we all came from the same African tribe- Many muslims believe that the Christians & Jews were all one & exemplify this by showing that Jesus and the disciples were all Jewish.
Maybe we should publish a new list of notable bigots and racists. I believe the reaction to that from the general public would be that of revulsion.Obviously we can’t include you all but just the main perpetrators and mass murderers.
We were aware of the claim made by some that the Union Jack was just simply named for the union of the parliaments of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the jack staff at a ships bow, where it has been traditionally placed. But that was just used as a smokescreen by the leading (cabbalistic) UK Jews who secretly named it for what I’ve cited above, which is endorsed by the fact that the Union Flag is officially, but without certainty, named for the Latin form (Jacobus) of the name of James I (VI of Scots) whose succession to the throne of England caused the union in 1603, which provided the pretext for the Union Jack to be named and designed.
Indeed it might be added that while the Royal Harp of Ireland was placed in the centre of the Union Jack during the pro-Jewish Commonwealth period, it was removed upon the restoration of Charles II, because royalists knew certain Jews had patterned it after the royal harp of Israel’s King David and used it to celebrate Cromwell’s rule of Great Britain as Lord Protector of the Commonwealth of England, Scotland, and Ireland, in a pseudo-messianic way.
The Jews’ banishment from England by order of Edward I hadn’t been rescinded by Parliament, but they got back into the country in the seventeenth century, and ironically on much the same basis that they had been expelled. For while Edward I had dismissed the Justices of the Jews in 1272 and 1287, because of their corrupt dealings; Oliver Cromwell received the Jews back after the Jewish magnate Manasseh ben Israel had offered him large sums to subvert and usurp the absolute powers of Charles I.
Cromwell’s impending financial insolvency was resolved shortly before he had delivered the ships and goods of the Jew, Fernandez Carvajal, in the Canary Islands, from seizure by the Spanish; and as a result, he appointed Carvajal, the first naturalized Jew in England since the expulsion in 1290, as chief military contractor and reorganizer of the Roundheads into a new model army.
Cromwell said he was a convinced Puritan, but his religion was really quirky, quasi-Jewish, Old Testament orientated stuff, like British Israelism; and his weird notion that the English were descendants of the Israelitish tribes of Judah and Benjamin gave the Jewish hypocrite Manasseh ben Israel the opportunity to suggest that a readmission of the Jews to England would “reunite all Israel”.
Lord Alfred Douglas, editor of a weekly review published by the North British Publishing Co., published a letter on 3 September 1921, received from a Mr L. D. Van Valckert of Amsterdam and containing extracts of letters sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim synagogue.
The first extract was from a letter received by Ebenezer Pratt of the synagogue, dated 16 June 1647, and from “O. C.” (i.e., Oliver Cromwell); and reads: ‘In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England. This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.’
In reply, the synagogue dispatched the following, dated 12 July 1647, addressed to “O. C.”, by E. Pratt: ‘Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles is removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given the opportunity to escape. His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.’
In November of 1647, Charles escaped to the Isle of Wight, where he played off Parliament and the army against each other, while trying to obtain help from abroad. Charles was, however, again arrested by the army, and tried by a Jewish kangaroo High Court of Justice, after Oliver Cromwell’s Jewish friend Carvajal had shown the alien lawyer Isaac Dorislaus, an agent of Manasseh ben Israel, how to draw up an indictment against England’s king.
The head of King Charles fell in 1649, after he had been figured to the army and its allies as a “war criminal” — c.f., the Jews’ contemporary ruse of figuring their relatively righteous opponents in war as “war criminals” — and as ostensibly guilty of embroiling two kingdoms in bloodshed a second time.
However upon the Restoration of the monarchy under Charles II, true justice was meted out on the Jews and their acolytes, when twelve of the Commissioners who had signed the king’s death warrant were hanged, drawn, and quartered for treason.
Here’s an article by Michael James of Frankfurt, Germany (2006), who has pointed out that the Edict of Expulsion, issued by Edward I of England in 1290, has never been rescinded; and hence he maintains that no Jew may legally live, let alone work in the UK, and that all Jews should be expelled immediately as illegal aliens and criminals.
Quote:
“With the recent sharp increase in anti-Muslim terrorism, the fire-bombing and stoning of mosques and vicious acts of violence directed at Muslim women peaceably going about their business, all of which is the direct consequence of a carefully calculated, hate-filled government strategy and the Jewish-owned media’s vindictive, fear-mongering cascade of lies, this writer has taken it upon himself to demand the immediate re-enforcement of the Edict of Expulsion of the Jews.
Please find below a letter written and sent to Britain’s most senior police officer, Sir Ian Warwick Blair, which was in turn copied and forwarded to the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth, and the Director of Public Prosecutions at the Crown Prosecution Service, Ken Macdonald QC …
Dear Sir Ian
In the light of public concern arising from issues related to racial integration and symbols of religious separation, I would like to draw your attention to a serious breach of the law in regard to a large number of illegal aliens resident in the United Kingdom, some of whom are presently engaged in subversive activities prejudicial to public order, the British Crown and the defence of the realm.
Let me warn you that a significant number of these illegal aliens have managed to inveigle themselves into positions of high influence within the British government, civil service, judiciary, the City of London and the print and electronic media. I therefore urge you, ahead of any unforeseen disclosures, to act swiftly to pre-empt any clandestine sophistry on the part of these criminals.
One such felon is Jack Straw, a man who, in direct contravention of British law, holds the position of Leader of the House of Commons. Under provisions that still command the full and inviolable force of the law as stipulated under the Edict of Expulsion of the Jews (1290), Mr Straw, a Jew currently engaged in a racist campaign of vilification against women of the Muslim faith, is entitled to neither domicile nor employment in the United Kingdom.
As a former foreign secretary who played an enabling role in the illegal invasion of Iraq and the consequent slaughter of around 655,000 Iraqi citizens, he also stands guilty of war crimes, for which he must and will be prosecuted.
Other illegal aliens who constitute a fifth column and hold senior and advisory positions within Her Majesty’s Government and associated bodies are Lord Goldsmith, Lord Levy, Peter Mandelson, David Miliband, Lord Sainsbury, Harry Cohen, Loiuse Ellman, Margaret Hodge, Gerald Kaufman, Gilliam Merron, Barabara Roche and many more too numerous to list.
I should also mention that your nominal superior, the Home Secretary, John Reid, is also married to a Jew, requiring of you his immediate arrest and the expulsion of his wife from the United Kingdom. This is to make no mention of the thousands of Jewish lobbyists, lawyers and PR executives who bring their malign influence to bear on the governance of our nation.
That such vast numbers of scofflaws continue to live and work illegally in the United Kingdom (no doubt laughing in secret at the easy manipulability of honest British citizens), makes not only a mockery of the rule of law, it also nullifies the legitimacy of all institutions within the United Kingdom, including the police service.
Unless this law is enforced quickly and without prejudice or political favour, all other laws are ipso facto defunct and require no observance on the part of the British people. The implications are frightening.
The Edict of Expulsion, a popular and just decree issued by King Edward the First, requiring the immediate divestiture and permanent expulsion of Jews without financial compensation, and thereafter ratified on numerous occasions by a grateful Parliament, has never been repealed and thus remains an actionable statute.
Despite occasional overtures on the part of the illegal and misnamed Board of Deputies of “British” Jews, Her Majesty the Queen has explicitly refused to rescind this most perfect legislation, and one can only surmise that she has done so for good reason.
This law was introduced to deal with ritual murder, abuses relating to the Jewish-Atonistic system of usury and the way in which Jews were found to be defrauding the common people by means of “clipping the coinage”. There is much evidence to suggest that such practices are still common today among those of the Jewish banking and financial fraternity, albeit in the form of digitized fraud and corruption. Lord Levy, currently on bail, is a most able representative of such nefarious activities.
I am also anxious to remind you that many of these illegal residents provide moral and financial assistance to terrorists in furtherance of a Jihadist creed known as Zionism, which is in part justified by Judaism, a militant religion predicated upon the principles of racial supremacy and genocide and encoded in that vile, anti-human tome, the Torah.
Although most Jews seem to live peaceably among the citizens of our unwitting host nation, adherents of the Zionist cause are given over to a virulent fanaticism that has by way of deception led, and still leads, to the deaths of countless young British soldiers in various conflicts around the world, including the present geopolitical wars of avarice in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Furthermore, the Jewish terrorist groups responsible for the assassination of Lord Moyne, the murderous attack on the King David Hotel, Operation Suzannah, and a whole swathe of mind-boggling false flag operations that took the lives of British soldiers and civilians without remorse or remission were, as you well know, covertly financed by Jewish financial concerns within the City of London; and you should have no reason to suppose that the subsumption of those groups by the Mossad organisation has materially changed the nature and intent of such anti-British terrorism.
Although a complete list of the heinous transgressions and serious felonies instigated by this reviled and detested cult of Zionism is far too long for me to enumerate in the space of this simple letter, I would be only too happy to make my research available to you upon request, including a very long tally of crimes committed by influential Jews that have somehow escaped the attention of the British police.
In the meantime, I suggest that you implement a simple search on the vast network of police and intelligence databases now deployed to capture personal information on almost every resident in the United Kingdom by using any combination of the following keywords: Mossad, Sayan, international drugs trafficking, child pornography, Zionism, snuff movies, Cult of Aton, sex slavery, false flag terrorism, Noachide laws, Talmud, blackmail, 911, financial fraud.
I am satisfied that the results displayed on your monitor will extend far beyond anything you had ever dreamed possible in this hideously deformed world of ours.
You may now be asking yourself how it is that such evil takes shape in the minds of men. Please bear with me, for the following information is essential to understanding why you must enforce the law in a way that will not encumber the long-suffering people of Palestine with yet more viciously genocidal Jews riding in on their brand-new Caterpillar bulldozers.
As an educated knight of the realm fully aware of the historical context, you will be only too familiar with the fallacious nature of the astro-theological religion of Judaism (Cult of Aton), a perfidious ideology based upon myths and fables stolen from the folkloric treasure houses of the venerable Egyptian Mystery Schools of old, all of which were inspired by that most ancient and superlative of high civilisations, the Gaelic Celts, a Druidic people inhabiting the British Isles who not only developed the purest form of religion known to mankind (true metaphysical Christianity and natural law), but who also devised and spoke into life the sacred Sanskrit and Hebrew languages thousands of years before they were known to the rest of the world by way of seaborne trade.
In addition to the disgraceful theft of astro-theological ideas nuanced by our ancestors at the dawn of the present age, this highly devious subculture, which today identifies itself as “Levitical Jews”, drew upon a litany of implausible stories spanning centuries of oral history, each yarn passed along from one generation to the next in the fashion of Chinese whispers, growing ever more fantastical in the breadth and scope of its epic nature.
Thus, the shabby criminal exploits of illiterate warlords presiding over a handful of itinerant rapists and sheep-jockeys living hand-to-mouth in mud and wattle shacks were transformed into blockbuster tales of incomparably wise kings and a holy, chosen people living in civic splendour on a shining hill.
It is upon the basis of the demonic and laughable claims made in the fictitious, plagiarizing and wrong-sided occult Torah that the current state of Israel was fraudulently conceived in 1948. In an age when scientists are able to analyse the fossilized faecal matter of dinosaurs to determine what they ate for breakfast millions of years ago, modern archaeologists equipped with the same technology are hard-pressed to find the slightest evidence for any of the events described in this Jewish comic book of bedside stories, and where they have, none of the material correlates with the timelines given by the “scribes” or is found to belong to a different, altogether more productive and civilised culture.
After a century of intense archaeological endeavour, today lavishly funded by the state of Israel (the American taxpayer), the search for evidence of a unitary Davidic kingdom and the so-called ancient Israelites has uncovered nothing more than a few scattered farm settlements and some bric-a-brac and pottery of Philistine origin. Quite clearly, we are dealing with world-class confidence tricksters who possess an uncanny penchant for falsifying history and making the rest of us believe it.
This is very important. Since most of these charlatans illegally resident in the United Kingdom are of Ashkenazim extraction and have no connection with the so-called Holy Land, I suggest that you discuss with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office the possibility of deporting these offenders to that region of the world from whence they originally came, which today falls under the political jurisdiction of Kazakhstan. Should you require any assistance in this matter, I would be more than delighted to help by contacting representatives of the Kazakhstan government myself.
Needless to say, the Edict of Expulsion provides for the total divestiture of Jews, including all property and financial assets. The costs pertaining to deportation could be deducted quite handily from the expected billions delivered to the public exchequer. It would then fall within the remit of the courts to determine how much, if any, of that revenue should be apportioned to the deportees in the form of a gracious resettlement allowance.
Please note that I have also written to Her Majesty the Queen and the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ken Macdonald QC, to inform them that you will soon have this matter firmly in hand and to allay them of any fears that their confidence in you may prove less than justified.
Indeed, in the knowledge that you are, in your capacity as Britain’s most senior police chief, a gentleman of integrity who is jealously committed to enforcing the law of the land, I am adequately assured that you will honour your oaths to the British Crown and Her Majesty the Queen in rigorously implementing the constabulary duties necessary to the swift expulsion of all Jews from the United Kingdom.
Yours sincerely
Michael James
British expatriate citizen
[Address supplied]
End Quote
Also, for you information Mr von Wessex, banker + gangster = bankster
Here’s a couple of meanings for the word bankster …
1. A portmanteau or blend word derived from combining “banker” and “gangster.” Usually referred to in the plural form “banksters” to refer to a predatory element within the financial services industry, such as those offering “too good to be true” adjustable mortgage rates for home buyers
2. Bankster: A portmanteau of the words “banker” and “gangster.” These are intergral to the capitalist system. While the nightly news might have you believe that young black and latino men with 9mm’s are the biggest threat to your life, banksters are far more dangerous. While a gangster might steal your posessions with a knife or a gun, a bankster will steal your possessions with a pen, paper and “legal” (read “unjust”) mumbo-jumbo snakeoil bullshit.
3. Bankster: Any member of the financial services industry; primarilly interested with the welfare of the capitalist class and their lackeys.
I trust these definitions won’t unduly upset you – especially since some of my readers have no doubt had their attention drawn to your financial services Web site as a result of your inflammatory comments.
Also Jews don’t have to own the main clearing house banks in England, so long as they own and control most of the gold behind currency creation and in their central bank that trades gold with bullion banks.
Gold Price Fixing began in the City of London in 1919, when representatives of N. M. Rothschild & Sons, Mocatta & Goldsmid, Pixley & Abell, Samuel Montagu & Co., and Sharp Wilkins were the officers of it.
Gold Price Fixing is now transacted daily in London by five members of the London Gold Pool under the auspices of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA); and it has traditionally taken place at the London office of N. M. Rothschilds & Sons, in St. Swithin’s Lane, but has only relatively recently been carried out by phone, because N. M. Rothschild & Sons superficially withdrew from gold trading and the London Gold Fixing in 2004, as a ruse to further conceal Rothschild dominance in the bullion trade, so that their plot to rule the world by the collateral of their vast store of gold could more easily proceed.
The Jew controlled mass media in the West would have the Gentile world believe the propaganda that the Rothschilds now only have a modest presence and are even suffering a reduction in power in finance worldwide; but the Jews only provide lies of that sort because they’re paranoid about Gentiles finding out that there’s no real mystery to Rothschild control of the world from behind the scenes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWFhfoAvkmc&feature=related
In fact it was Lionel Rothschild who boasted of his family’s leading role in finance in the Protocols, when he said: ‘Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invisible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.’
The facts are that the Rothschild banking and finance family was worth at least $6 billion in 1850, and owned about half of Europe’s finance shortly thereafter; and what they were worth in 1850 would have been worth $149,106,382,978, using the U.S. Consumers Price Index, and a colossal $29,266,640,625,000 using the nominal GDP per capita, in 2005.
Today’s estimates that the Rothschilds have a net worth of anything between $100–400 trillion are actually quite plausible, especially since there’s at least 5 billion troy ounces of gold in bullion in the world, the bulk of which has been in the hands of the Rothschild banksters since the turn of the twentieth century.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9t4MIfoABfg&feature=related
Indeed if some claims the Jew controlled mass media have made are true, the Rothschilds must have been silly enough to lose as much as 98 percent of their wealth since 1850, which is hardly likely because the leading males of the evil Jewish family had entered into a pact to use their combined wealth to gain control the world for the Jews from the beginning.
Which African tribe are you from, Mr von Wessex? Or are you really trying to tell us England’s aristocracy descends from the apes?
Who cares if Cowell is ‘half Jewish” he is the ONLY one that even tells these half talented thugs that they are TERRIBLE.
Have you ever tried to repeat this train of thought with another race? What about the chinese, or russians? Or maybe another religion, like Christianity… I think you should, because I really think that the kind of ‘factual evidence’ of this race’s behaviour and desires that you’re producing could be produced about anyone. It’s not a specific people who do wrong, it’s mankind as a whole.
Not to say God doesn’t exist, but remove Him and religion from the equation entirely, along with any other division you’re tempted to make, and how can you distinguish people? We’re all the same, we make the same mistakes. A man of any race or creed in a powerful position has the same risk of using it badly and going down the wrong path as the next. What divides us is our intelligence, our morality, and our stability. Any person can have all these things in abundance. That is obvious. So just because we’ve chosen to label certain people, how can you possibly criticise them as a whole without ever second guessing yourself? I couldn’t do that to a room full of people. I shudder at the notion of applying it to millions, because I know I can’t be right, no one could be.