The Jews don’t deny that they killed Christ – they don’t even try their traditional ruse of passing the blame to someone else for their wickedness by giving the Romans the credit for the Crucifixion. In fact Jews rejoice in Christ’s betrayal by Judas and torturous death; and in their present depraved state, alienated from God and judicially blinded by their rejection of the gospel preached by the apostles, they’d certainly kill Christ again without hesitation if given the chance.
Here’s a video showing a Jew in Israel violently threatening Christians from the UK, saying “your f**king Jesus” and that he’s “proud” the Jews killed him …
Here’s the notorious Jesus is Magic video showing the wicked Jewish comedian Sarah Silverman getting lots of laughs from her audience – no doubt with not a few Jews present, by saying: “I hope the Jews did kill Christ, I’d f**king do it again in a second …”
Religious Jews actually believe there’s no greater criminal in history than Jesus Christ; and they argue that by vilifying the Pharisees, who were the prototypes of their rabbis and scholars today, Jesus started “an evil trend of suspicion toward Judaism”, fuelled by the New Testament and the Church Fathers, that has issued in an anti-Semitic depiction of Jews as Christ killers, and precipitated “nearly 2,000 years of living hell for the Jewish people, culminating in the Holocaust.”
Two-faced Jews, and their Gentile acolytes who want to curry favour with Jews so they can continue without being disturbed in their secular and religious comfort zones, say any denigration of Jesus Christ by Jews is a thing of the past. For even the name of Jesus has been reduced to a sacrilegious colloquialism in the state of Israel, and blasphemous teachings and legends about him have been retained in the Jews’ most sacred literature the Talmud; and you can search high and low for anything good written by Jews about Jesus Christ and find absolutely nothing, because a Jew who wrote that sort of thing would be denying Judaism, and immediately suspected of treachery and soon ostracized.
The Jews have, admittedly, heavily edited the Talmud from the time translations of it were first made by prominent Gentiles late in the sixteenth century; but they’ve only done that because they’ve feared that they would suffer ‘anti-Semitic persecution’ from non-Jews, after what they were being taught by their rabbis about Jesus Christ had become known.
P. L. B. Drach endorses the foregoing in a translation of a Polish encyclical distributed among the Jews in Hebrew, where he writes: “This is why we enjoin you, under the pain of excommunication major, to print nothing in future editions, whether of Mischna or of the Gemara, which relates whether for good or evil to the acts of Jesus the Nazarene, and to substitute instead a circle like this: O, which will warn the rabbis and schoolmasters to teach the young these passages only viva vocc. By means of this precaution the savants amongst the Nazarenes will have no further pretext to attack us on this subject.”
Even though the Jews have heavily edited the Talmud, that which has been retained in it has been quite rightly cited by non-Jews as a despicable hate crime, which should be prosecuted under the hate crime legislation the Jews are presently hypocritically trying to introduce to stifle righteous protest against Jewish atrocities committed since the Crucifixion.
Jews don’t like taking in proselytes because they fear they’ll become informers after finding out about the gross wickedness of the Jewish people; and even though the Jews have heavily edited the Talmud, they still don’t like non-Jews reading it; and the leading sage Moses Maimonides wouldn’t suffer it, saying: “every Gentile who studies it, and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.”
In fact the Talmud says: “to communicate to a goy [Gentile] about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all the Jews, for if the goys knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.” “One should and must make a false oath, when the goys ask if our books contain anything against them. Then are we bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that.”
Even though the Talmud has been heavily edited, the censored excerpts have been carefully preserved by the Jews under the name of Chesronot Shas, and have never been formally divorced from the Talmud. Hence the Jew Julius Gottlieb, when commenting on the Codex Hebraicus found buried in the royal library at Munich, said that “this manuscript of the Babylonian Talmud was written in 1342, and had the good fortune to escape the hands of the censors.”
Even the edited (censored) versions of the Talmud still make blasphemous allusions to Jesus Christ and often denigrate him; and the Jews have really tried to portray Jesus Christ as Israel’s antichrist in the Talmud, and in the media and entertainment industry they so tightly control as a means of grossly immoral, antichristian, pro-Jewish propaganda today.
For example, a Talmudic tractate likens Christ to the Jews’ Old Testament enemy the prophet Balaam, by saying: “Hast thou heard how old Balaam was? It is not actually stated, but since it is written: ‘Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days’, it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old.” For Jesus Christ died at about age thirty-three, and Jews generally believe he conspired Balaam-like to defile and destroy Israel, as a prophet and miracle worker who “instigated” the new dispensation of Christianity, which puts believing Jews and Gentiles on the same ground morally as one body worldwide.
The aforementioned Talmudic commentary is, however, actually a corrupt rabbinical interpretation of Psalm 55.23, which has nothing to do with Christ, and if anything refers to Judas Iscariot as an exemplification of wicked persons in general; and the thirty-three years of Christ’s life are ridiculed in a similar manner in the thirty-three degees of Scottish Rite pro-Jewish Freemasonry – many rites of Freemasonry have pronounced quasi-Jewish and cabbalistic connotations.
Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody a sorcerer in the books by J. K. Rowling
Another Talmudic tractate ridicules Christ who wrought miracles, by saying Balaam was blind in one eye, “as it is said, [and the man Balaam] whose eye is open … he practised enchantment by means of his membrum”; which appears to have been carried over into protagonists in modern literature like Alastor “Mad-Eye” Moody with his left eye missing after fighting with wizards, in the popular Harry Potter stories with their pronounced Jewish connotations and allusions to Israel’s end-time antichrist.
Indeed it appears that the way Balaam has been used to allude to Jesus Christ in the Talmud has a counterpart in the way Christ was portrayed with an injury to one eye in Mel Gibson’s popular and controversial movie: The Passion of the Christ (2004).
For by portraying Christ with an eye injury, Gibson had, no doubt unwittingly, sacrilegiously portrayed him as a “blemished” and hence unacceptable offering to God for the sins of humanity, which would have greatly pleased the Jews who control the film industry in America and knew a blind animal couldn’t be offered to God in Old Testament times. For according to scripture, one of the “blemishes” of an animal that made it unacceptable as an offering to Jehovah under the old and now defunct legal dispensation was blindness, i.e., in part or in whole (Lev. 22.22; Deut. 15.21).
Moshe Dayan
But things are worse than that, because the one-eyed Christ in Mel Gibson’s movie has got connotations that make him look like the biblical end-time antichrist. For scripture says of antichrist: “Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! The sword shall be upon his arm and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, AND HIS RIGHT EYE SHALL BE UTTERLY DARKENED” (Zech 11.117).
A couple of Jewish candidates for Israel’s antichrist have come on the scene relatively recently; and one was Baron Elie de Rothschild who had a black patch over his right eye, and another was the Jew Moshe Dayan who had a black patch over his LEFT eye.
But here’s something real weird that readers might like to comment on. Moshe Dayan has also appeared in public with a black patch over his RIGHT eye, as in the following video! Was there something wrong with both of his eyes or was he just faking the left eye injury all along – his wife called his eye-patch “a symbol of his country”?
Also, did Gibson inadvertently “destroy” Christ’s RIGHT eye, thus making him look like the biblical false prophet or antichrist, or was he told to ‘damage’ the right eye of the actor, by one of the many Jews no doubt lurking in the background during the film’s production, who would have wanted to make sure they got a truly (Talmudic) Jewish Jesus across to movie patrons and their co-religionists?
According to an article at http://www.freerepublic.com …
“Violence is Gibson’s natural film language, and his Jesus is unsparingly pummelled, flayed, kicked, and otherwise smitten from first to last. After his arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane by Jewish temple guards, Jesus is dragged in shackles to the high priests. By the time he arrives, he has been beaten, knocked down, and thrown off a bridge. His right eye is swollen shut. (“I didn’t want to see Jesus looking really pretty,” Gibson said. “I wanted to mess up one of his eyes, destroy it.”)”
So as a result of what they’ve been taught by their rabbis, Jews today generally believe the man known as Jesus of Nazareth was an antitype of evil individuals in the Old Testament, like Israel’s enemy Balaam; and that he also fulfilled prophecies like the one in the biblical book of Zechariah that says an “idol shepherd” would come on the scene in Israel – and didn’t Christ proclaim himself as the good shepherd and chief shepherd in the New Testament gospels and epistles?
The foregoing has been consolidated by the Talmudic rabbis and scholars who have taught their co-religionists that a bona fide rabbinical court put Jesus to death for sorcery, inciting Jews to idolatry, and for contempt of rabbinical authority.
For example, the Talmud says: ‘On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, “He is going forth to be stoned because he practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Anyone who can say anything in his favour let him come forward and plead on his behalf.” But since nothing was brought forward in his favour he was hanged on the eve of the Passover.’
Moreover Rabbi Simeon ben Lakish said, in the Talmud, ‘Woe unto him who maketh himself alive by the name of God’, which is, of course, a wicked allusion to the resurrection of Jesus Christ consistent with the Jews’ belief that he was raised by incantations – c.f., cabbalistic Jews (i.e., Jewish sorcerers) use the name of their g-d for divination and in incantations.
Here’s a recent video of a Jewish TV interviewer in Israel making fun of Jesus Christ and blaspheming him in a whole host of particularly nasty and vile ways – the pope has actually demanded an apology for this one because it was so pointed and wicked ….
Like the Pharisees of old, many Jews today also like to denigrate Jesus Christ as “a man gluttonous and a winebibber” (c.f., Matt. 11.19). The following video shows Jews blaspheming Christ by saying he was fat and his mother was a whore ….
Based on corrupt rabbinical interpretations of the New Testament, Jews today also say Jesus sinned by repudiating the Talmudic law of kosher food, renounced the laws of honouring one’s parents by ostensibly dishonouring his mother, repudiated the Sabbath, and even flagrantly violated it by plucking grain and inciting his disciples to do the same.
Jews today also argue that Christ’s healing of a man’s withered hand on the Sabbath was unlawful, because it wasn’t a matter of saving a life; and they say he defied the rabbis and “sacrilegiously” caused people to do away with the Jewish holidays of Yom Kippur, Pesach, Sukkot, and Shavu’ot. Jews also believe Christ disregarded the oneness and unity of God, and introduced the “heresy” of the “new trinity”, which, they say, even “blasphemously” included himself, and so it goes on.
Here’s a video of a Jew saying Jesus was a bastard ….
In conclusion, the Jews’ case against Jesus since the Crucifixion has been succinctly summed by one of their ilk who has said:
“The false, rebellious message of Jesus has been thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately, however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the world; today, over 1.5 billion Gentiles believe in Jesus.
These lost souls mistakenly think they have found salvation in Jesus; tragically, they are in for a rude awakening. Truth and eternal life are found directly from G-d, through performing His Law. Any “mediator” only separates from G-d.”
3 Comments
I’m a JEW and I think Jesus is WONDERFUL.
We know Jesus is wonderful, because that’s his name in the Tanakh (Isa. 9.6); but why do you, as a Jew, say he’s wonderful?
Jews learn about Jesus from the Talmud, which says all sorts of horrible things about him that can’t be substantiated from his life as it’s recorded in real history.
The Talmud is based on the Mischnah of the corrupt oral law of the Pharisees who made the word of God of none effect by their tradition and killed Christ to retain their hypocritical power over the Jewish people, like the power the rabbis have in Jewry today.
By killing Christ the chief priests and scribes and Pharisees ignorantly fulfilled God’s hidden and higher purpose that there should be a sacrifice for the sin of fallen humanity on the cross, which was something taught to the Jews through the Levitical sacrifices and in the psalms and the prophets (e.g., Ps. 22 and Isa. 53), and is said to be a something the messiah would fulfill when he came to Israel.
Even the Muslims know the Dajjal (antichrist) will be a Jew with Muslim and women followers and Edomitish characteristics and one eye; and like most of the Jews, they’ll shortly receive a man of that sort as the messiah instead of God’s Son Jesus Christ.
And the Talmud is valid because??