According to Abe Foxman and his crew of Jewish disinformationists in the ADL, the documentation generally known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is, quote:

“a classic in paranoid, racist literature. Taken by the gullible as the confidential minutes of a Jewish conclave convened in the last years of the nineteenth century, it has been heralded by anti-Semites as proof that Jews are plotting to take over the world. Since its contrivance around the turn of the century by the Russian Okhrana, or Czarist secret police, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” has taken root in bigoted, frightened minds around the world.

The booklet’s twenty-four sections spell out the alleged secret plans of Jewish leaders seeking to attain world domination. They represent the most notorious political forgery of modern times. Although thoroughly discredited, the document is still being used to stir up anti-Semitic hatred.’

Indeed the following article by Abe Foxman, National Director of the ADL, appeared in the New York Sun on November 18, 2005 …

“It is now 100 years since the emergence of the infamous forgery, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” the document which generated massive anti-Semitism all over the world.

The story of the Protocols is well known. Developed by the Tsar’s secret police in 1905, it claimed to be the real discussions of the Jewish leaders’ conspiracy to rule the world. It is a classic in paranoid, racist literature. Taken by the gullible as the confidential minutes of a Jewish conclave convened in the last years of the 19th century, it has been heralded by anti-Semites as proof that Jews are plotting to take over the world.

The document had a life of its own after World War I. It spread through Russia during the turmoil of the Communist revolution and its aftermath, playing a role in the murder of tens of thousands of Jews. It was picked up by auto magnate Henry Ford in the United States. “The Dearborn Independent,” owned by Ford, published an American version of the Protocols between May and September of 1920 in a series called “The International Jew: the World’s Foremost Problem.” The articles were later republished in book form with half a million copies in circulation. This helped to spread pernicious anti-Semitism in this country in the 1920s.

Adolf Hitler cited the document as proof that his anti-Jewish campaign was not only justified, but necessary to protect Germans from the Jewish menace. And since the founding of Israel, Arab countries have routinely used the Protocols to spur anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hatred.

As we remember how damaging this forgery has been for 100 years, the question we face is whether or not it will continue to have such a devastating impact in the future.

Unfortunately, the signs of recent events bode ill. Whether it is the document itself or the underlying concept of the document – that Jews have undue power in the world and conspire as Jews to serve Jewish interests and to harm others – there are a host of indicators that this insidious idea has a future.

The list of examples is long. On October 16, 2003, speaking to a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference in Malaysia, then-Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad told the assembly of 57 nations that Islam must combat the Jews who today, “rule this world by proxy.”

Slews of articles and books have appeared since September 11 telling of the great Jewish conspiracy that underlies the attack on the World Trade Center. Holocaust deniers in the Arab world and elsewhere attribute the acceptance by the world of the “myth” of the Holocaust to Jewish control of the international media. Even in America this idea is alive, as when some critics of the war in Iraq blamed it on Jewish neo-conservatives, thereby absorbing central themes of “The Protocols” – of mysterious, excessive Jewish power and of Jews working against the interests of their country to serve Jewish interests.

And it is notable that both left-wing and right-wing conspiratorialists are using the theme of Jewish power and control to explain a complicated world.

Most directly, two major Arab productions for television – one a 41-part series that appeared on Egyptian state television in 2002, the other a 21-part Syrian production that aired in 2003 on the Lebanon-based satellite network Al-Manar – created dramatic presentations for mass audiences based on the idea that the Protocols are indeed the secret plan of the Jews to dominate the world.

It is not merely these manifestations, however, that produce concern but the underlying motivation of those accusations. It has often been said that anti-Semitism has little to do with the Jews but is rather a need of societies in conflict and turmoil to find convenient scapegoats for problems. The Jews as scapegoats goes back at least to the Middle Ages with charges of blood rituals and poisoning the wells.

“The Protocols” conspiracy gave it a modern political slant that transformed vague notions into organized theory. And, of course, in the world we live in, where terrorism, extremism and hatred are rampant and operating in many societies around the world, where globalism brings uncertain change, the opportunities for such scapegoating increase drastically. The most recent manifestation of this came after the suicide blasts at three hotels in Jordan carried out by an Iraq-based arm of Al Qaeda, when some in the Arab world immediately blamed the attacks on Jews and Israel.

When Mahathir Mohamad blamed international Jewish currency dealers for the recession in Malaysia, he was giving his people a simple explanation to a complex problem. When Jewish conspirators were blamed for September 11, it was a way to avoid the internal challenges of Islamic extremism in the Middle East. When Jewish neo-cons were held responsible for “pushing” the war in Iraq, it served as an explanation as to why America was so intent on toppling Saddam Hussein a time when many people were questioning the rationale for war. In other words, when the moment is ripe, demagogues the world over can seize on the Protocols, or the concept behind it, to explain all problems.

Like most problems of the kind, combating this disease requires leadership, education and political will. If political, religious and educational leaders work together in exposing the lie of the Protocols and its inherent dangers, then we have the beginning of counteraction. Ultimately, societies must realize that there is no substitute for facing up to real problems, no matter how complex. Blaming the Jews will not solve any problems. Indeed, it will make thing worse. Facing up to challenges without the historic scapegoat of the Jew is to make progress toward a better world.”

There is also the recent ruling by a Russian court – the courts in the country were Jew controlled at the time – that the Protocols are “an anti-Semitic forgery”.

To quote Michael A. Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times, November 28, 1993, …

MOSCOW — In what observers called a historic ruling, a Russian
court has pronounced the infamous “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” an
anti-Semitic forgery — the first such verdict in the land where the fraud
originated 90 years ago.
“Up to now every country had disengaged itself from this shameful
book, except Russia, where it was concocted,” Tancred Golenpolsky, the
publisher of the Moscow Jewish newspaper that won the ruling, said
Saturday.
The court case arose 10 months ago after Golenpolsky’s Jewish
Gazette accused the radical nationalist group Pamyat (“Memory”) of printing
anti-Semitic sentiments. Fostering ethnic conflict is punishable under
Russian law.
Pamyat responded with a $19,000 libel suit, saying it has nothing
against Arabs, who are also Semitic.
In its defense, the Gazette noted that Pamyat’s newspaper published
extracts from the Protocols. The document, which details purported
meetings of Jewish elders at which they plotted to seize control of the
whole world, became the focus of the trial.
On Friday, a Moscow district court judge ruled that the document
was indeed a forgery. She turned down Pamyat’s claim and fined the
organization court costs of about $190.
The ruling by Judge Lyudmila Belikova was hailed by the Los
Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, which provided financial support for
Golenpolsky and documentary material to the court.
“The ruling today under Russian law destroys any veneer of
respectability that hatemongers around the globe have tried to bestow on
this hateful work,” said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the center’s associate dean,
in a statement.
Pamyat was unrepentant.
“They have no decency left to say the Protocols are a fake when the
entire history of Russia after 1917 is solid proof that they are genuine,”
said Dmitri D. Vasiliev, head of the organization, in an interview
Saturday.
Referring to the fact that such communist theoreticians and
luminaries as Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky were Jewish, he said: “Who made
the revolution? Who ruined and sold out the country? Take time and read the
Protocols; the answers are there gaping at you from every page.”
But Golenpolsky argued that the significance in the ruling lies not
in its prospect of eradicating anti-Semitism in Russia. “Anti-Semitism will
appear every time prices on potatoes and bread go up,” he said in an
interview. “What’s important is that law and the government will take a
stand.”
For most of this century, the Protocols has been a key manifesto of
anti-Semitism. It was used as a pretext for Eastern European pogroms, was
a centerpiece of Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” and permeated Nazi propaganda. It
consistently surfaces across the globe as purported documentation of a
Jewish conspiracy.
At the same time it has been consistently condemned by courts
around the world. In 1927, an American judge ordered auto magnate Henry
Ford to destroy a large printing of the book he had personally financed; as
recently as 1991 the South African government banned it as an immoral
publication.
Contemporary evidence shows that the Protocols were written by
members of Czar Nicholas II’s “Okhranka,” or secret police, in 1903. Its
very birth was particularly unsavory; as much as 60 percent of the document
is a bald plagiarism from an anti-Semitic tract published in France around
that time.
The Okhranka fashioned the document as the purported agreement of a
group of Jewish elders meeting in Switzerland in 1897 to plot Jewish
hegemony through the destruction of Christian civilization. It was first
published in Russia on the eve, and as the instrument, of the vicious 1903
Odessa pogrom.
Judge Belikova based her ruling in part on testimony by a
three-member panel of Russian academic experts who examined the document
and its textual and legal history. The experts were agreed to by both
sides, although Golenpolsky said his only stipulation was that they not be
Jewish.
“My conclusion was that this is prima facie apocryphal and that
this is an anti-Semitic document,” said one of the experts, Lionel Dadiani
of Moscow’s Institute of Sociology, who wrote a 67-page opinion for the
court.
Pamyat’s Vasiliev said Saturday that he intends to bring further
cases against the Jewish Gazette.”

So what really are the facts about the Protocols?

Well it all began back in 1773, in the city of Frankfort, when the Jew Mayer Amschel and twelve other wealthy Jews agreed to pool their resources to set up a shadow administration to rule the leading Western Gentile nations; and to create a world revolutionary movement – in modern terms a global terrorist organization – that would provide the Jews with a way to more easily destroy Christians, dominate Gentiles, and bring in an ideal world under Israel’s antichrist.

The conspiracy of Rothschild and his cohorts was revised at twenty-four secret meetings in the 1800s; and what the Jews discussed at those meetings was put in writing, and some of it appears in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Indeed all indications are that Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild was the speaker in the meeting recorded in the Protocols.

The Protocols came into the hands of Gentiles in 1884, after a Russian general’s daughter, Justine Glinka, employed a Jewish informer, Joseph Schorst, a member of Mizraim Lodge of the Oriental rite of Freemasonry in Paris, to ferret out information that could be used to expose certain Jews she knew were plotting against the Tsar at the time. For Schorst offered to obtain for Glinka a document “of great importance to Russia” for the price of 2,500 francs, which sum was duly passed to him by Glinka who received from him what became known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Glinka forwarded Schorst’s French version and a Russian translation of the Jews’ Protocols to the Russian general Orgevski, in St. Petersburg; and he, in turn, passed them to his army superior, General Cherevin, for delivery to the Tsar. Cherevin, however, filed the Protocols in the Russian archives out of fear of reprisals from Jews; but several years later Glinka passed a copy of the French originals to Alexis Sukhotin, the Marechal de Noblesse of her district, who showed it to two friends, Philip Stepanov, and a Professor Sergius Nilus, an official of the Department of Foreign Religions at Moscow.

Sergei Nilus

Stepanov printed and circulated copies privately in 1897; and Nilus published excerpts in 1901, in his book: The Great within the Small: The Coming of the Antichrist and the Rule of Satan on Earth, and again in 1905, in his other work titled: The Jewish Peril, excerpts of which had appeared in Russian newspapers as early as 1903.

A second edition of Nilus’s first book was scheduled for publication in 1917, but because of the Bolshevik Revolution in that year and Kerensky’s rise to power the title was sought out and all but a few copies destroyed. In fact Nilus was, himself, incarcerated and tortured in Kiev by the Cheka after being told by the Jewish president of the court that sentenced him that he had done “incalculable harm” to the Jews’ evil cause by publishing what became known as the Protocols.

The Jewish president of the court wasn’t wrong, because a copy of Nilus’s book had earlier been deposited in the British Museum at London, date-stamped 10 August 1906; and the Protocols in its appendix were translated from Russian into English in 1920, by Victor E. Marsden, a British “Morning Post” correspondent and former resident of Russia.

Marsden then published the Protocols, and they aroused interest worldwide because they had an obvious answer in the conspiracy behind the French Revolution and what the Jewish Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917. The Jews were infuriated by Marsden’s publication of the Protocols, so they made sure he paid for it. For shortly after he had returned to England as the “Morning Post’s” special correspondent in the suite of the Prince of Wales, who was making a tour of the British Empire, Mr Marsden died suddenly and mysteriously, and doubtless by poison at the hand of agents of Jewry’s Bet Din.

It should, however, be noticed that what Nilus published was really only an outline of what Mayer Amschel had discussed with the twelve other leading Jewish financiers and their acolytes at Frankfort, which was endorsed by Dr Ehrenpreis, Chief Rabbi of Sweden, in 1924, who said: ‘Long have I been well acquainted with the contents of the Protocols, indeed for many years before they were ever published in the Christian press. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion were in point of fact not the original Protocols at all, but a compressed extract of the same. Of the seventy elders of Zion, in the matter of origin and existence of the original Protocols, there are only ten men in the entire world who know.’

The Jews have, of course, laboured long, hard, and hysterically to try to prove the Protocols a forgery; but they’ve never refuted the damning indictment that the doctrine of the documentation fits perfectly with what the leading Jews and their acolytes have been doing with their money behind the scenes in political powerplay since the 1789 revolution in France.

Hysterical attempts by Jews and their acolytes to dismantle the damning indictment of the Protocols

In fact the newspaper correspondent Philip Graves was the first to use the word “forgery” in connection with the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, in his somewhat dubious “London Times” article on them; and it actually inadvertently accommodates the possibility that an authentic version of the documentation existed somewhere at the time, because the word can mean “a copy representing or presented as the original”, and among its synonyms are “imitation” and “counterfeit”.

When trying to undo the glaring authenticity of The Protocols of Zion the Jews and their acolytes have more specifically argued that they were fabricated by Tsarist anti-Semites in Russia and plagiarized from Maurice Joly’s mid-nineteenth century French satire directed against Napoleon III. However it should be noticed that Maurice Joly (b. 1829) had Jewish attributes, as originally named Moses Joel; and he had Jewish associates, and the founder of the Alliance Israélite Universelle, who was a friend of the Jewish author of the doctrine he satirized, heavily influenced him.

Moses Joel - alias Maurice Joly

Joly never said he originated the scheme of government dealt with in his work; and it’s plain that he attacked the Machiavellian dictator Napoleon III (an exponent of a form of government advocated by leaders of the French Revolution) to discredit attempts to blame Jews for fomenting the French Revolution from behind the scenes.

Portions of the Protocols are similar to Joly’s work, but doubtless only because Joly received the doctrine for his work from Jews in France, who were of the ilk of the speaker recorded in the Protocols, and doubtless of the ilk of the Jews who gave the Jewish informer Joseph Schorst of Paris the documentation called and/or contained in The Protocols of Zion.

Indeed the Protocols are quite different from Joly’s Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli in terms of tone and intent; and even Jews trying to discredit the Protocols as a forgery have argued that Joly’s work was itself partly plagiarized, possibly from a popular novel by Eugene Sue.

Honoré Mirabeau was a leading instigator of the 1789 revolution in France; and he had knowledge of a “code of hell”, which had obvious affinity with Joly’s Dialogue in Hell. Nesta Webster writes, in Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, ‘It is this “code of hell” set forth in [Mirabeau's] “Projet de Révolution” that we shall find repeated in succeeding documents throughout the last hundred years – in the correspondence of “the Alta Vendita”, in the Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu by Maurice Joly, in the Revolutionary Catechism of Bakunin, in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and in the writings of the Russian Bolsheviks today. Whatever doubts may be cast on the authenticity of any of these documents, the indisputable fact thus remains that as early as 1789 this Machiavellian plan of engineering revolution, and using people as a lever for raising a tyrannical minority to power, had been formulated: further, that the methods described in this earliest “Protocol” have been carried out according to plan from that day to this.

Joly’s work has been presented to the gullible public as ‘proof’ that it was the source of Nilus’s Protocols, because an exiled White Russian landowner from Saratov, Mikhail Raslovev, ‘providentially’ provided Philip Graves, a local correspondent for “The Times” in Istanbul, with a tattered copy of it and told him to compare it with a translation of Nilus’s Protocols.

However the way a “tattered copy” of the Dialogues was passed to Graves is suspiciously similar to the ruse of the Gibeonites in the Old Testament, who tricked the Israelitish general Joshua into sparing their lives, by saying that they had come from another country, and had ‘proved it’ by producing old shoes, old garments, and dry and mouldy bread, as if to indicate that they had made a long journey and hadn’t come from the city nearby his army was about to destroy.

Indeed “The Times” granted Raslovev a substantial loan that didn’t need to be repaid after he had passed on a copy of the Dialogues, which further indicates that he and those who commissioned him had something other than championing the truth in mind at the time.

A copy of Joly’s work passed to the Tsar of Russia, and it caused him to alter his opinion of Nilus’s work and think it was plagiarized, and so become complacent about the imminent Bolshevik uprising, unknown as Joly’s work was at the time and after almost every copy had been destroyed. The reason why the rare copy of Joly’s work reached the Tsar was, of course, because Jews feared that Nilus’s Protocols, with their blatant affinity with the aspirations of communists and Zionists, would forewarn the Russian autocrat of the coming revolution in Russia, and expose the Jewish Bolsheviks who applied the precepts in them to the letter after being funded by Jews and backed by pro-Jewish Masonic treachery and intrigue.

The Tsar had probably even suspected that Lionel Nathan de Rothschild (1809-79) had made a substantial contribution to the Protocols; because he would have recognized that the author was obviously someone with profound knowledge of the way high finance was being managed by the Rothschilds in Europe; and he would have known that Lionel Rothschild had been celebrated as the Jewish banker “Sidonia”, in Benjamin Disraeli’s Coningsby (1844).

The Tsar had evidently also concluded that the Protocols were genuine after realizing the doctrine was delivered to leading Jewish political and social scientists, financiers, industrialists, journalists, and economists, just prior to the First Zionist Congress at Basel in 1897. Indeed he would have been concerned about the ramifications of the Protocols’ authenticity, because they allude to Tsar Alexander II’s assassination, where it’s written: ‘such was, until recent times, the Russian [so-called] autocracy, the one and only serious foe we had in the world, without counting the Papacy.’

But that which has the most weight in confirming the authenticity of Nilus’s Protocols is the fact that one of the earliest extant versions of its doctrine only ever reached the public domain because God Almighty intervened in a remarkable and obviously retributive way.

For in July of 1785, in the Bavarian city of Ratisbon (now Regensburg), an Illuminist named Lanze was preparing to carry documentation relating to a conspiracy for world government into Silesia, when he was providentially struck dead by lightning!

As a result of the bizarre incident the Bavarian police arrested an Illuminist named Xavier Zwack; and when raiding his home in Landshut they found several books and over two hundred letters that had passed between the leading Illuminist Adam Weishaupt and his high-ranking Illuminist brethren of the Aeropagite class. Information of that sort was then edited and collated; and it was published at Munich under the title of The Original Writings of the Order and Sect of the Illuminati (1787), and the essence of the documentation concurs with The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

Despite the propaganda Jews and their acolytes concoct and circulate about the ‘forgery’ of the Protocols, they continue to sell well; and they’re quoted in and have provided the doctrinal basis for many books written for the benefit of Arab nations and the Islamic world; and they’ve doubtless enlightened many people as to why they should not support the devices of the Jews running the rebellious Talmudic state of Israel and the states of nations by a shadow regime.

To quote one pro-Jewish disinformationist:

In the civil war following the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917,
the reactionary White Armies made extensive use of the Protocols
to incite widespread slaughters of Jews. At the same time, Russian
emigrants brought the Protocols to western Europe, where the Nilus
edition served as the basis for many translations, starting in 1920.
Just after its appearance in London in 1920, Lucien Wolf exposed the
Protocols as a plagiary of the earlier work of Joly and Goedsche, in
a pamphlet of the Jewish Board of Deputies. The following year, in
1921, the story of the forgery was published in a series of articles
in the London Times by Philip Grave, the paper’s correspondent in
Constantinople. A whole book documenting the forgery was also published
in the same year in America by Herman Bernstein. Nevertheless, the
Protocols continued to circulate widely. They were even sponsored by
Henry Ford in the United States until 1927, and formed an important
part of the Nazis’ justification of genocide of the Jews in World
War II.

After World War II and the attendant Holocaust, the Protocols
ceased being part of the popular conscience in Europe in the United
States. However, with the birth of the State of Israel and the eruption
of the Arab-Israeli conflict, they became part of state-sponsored
antisemitism throught the Arab world. Antisemitic ideas had already
been spread by Christian missionaries in the Middle East since the early
19th century. This activity erupted in the Damascus blood libel in 1840,
which was followed by many recurrences of the libel in other Arab
countries in the latter half of the 19th century. European antisemitic
works were already being published in Cairo in Arabic before the turn
of the century. The Protocols were translated into Arabic from the
French edition by al-Khuri Antun Yamin, probably in the late 1920’s.
Many editions appeared starting in the 1950’s, mostly in Cairo and
Beirut. President Nasser publicly asserted their authenticity, and his
brother, Shawqi Abd’ al-Nasir, published an edition in 1968 entitled
“Brutukulat Hukama Sahyun wa-Ta`alim at-Talmud” (“Protocols of the
Learned Men of Zion and Teachings of the Talmud”). In the same year,
an Islamic congress which convened in Cairo produced some papers
containing antisemitic themes which had been rampant in prewar Europe.
Unlike its counterpart in Europe, antisemitism in the Arab world seems
to be officially sanctioned and promoted. It forms part of religious
sermons and appears to be part of public education.

The Protocols today form part of the ideology of the Muslim
Brotherhood and its allied Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), whose
part in the Palestinian intifada is well known. The statement that
the “enemies” or the “Zionist invasion” are behind “secret societies”
such as the “Freemasons, Rotary Clubs, the Lions and others” around
the world for purposes of sabotage is repeated three times in the
Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement. Mention of these
organizations, together with the claim that the “enemies” were
“behind the French Revolution, the Communist revolution and most
of the revolutions we heard and hear about”, reveals direct borrowing
from the Protocols and its predecessors. The Protocols are finally
mentioned by name in Article 32:

… The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists
aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will
have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further
expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the “Protocols of
the Elders of Zion” (“Brutukulat Hukama Sahyun” in the Arabic
original), and their present conduct is the best proof of what we
are saying.

Jewish informers have shown how the leading Jews have received the fallen angel Satan (also known as Lucifer) as their god; and hence it’s no marvel that a Luciferian maxim, that “the end [of an ideal Jewish world] justifies the means of twenty centuries of mass murder and pathological lying] to try to attain that end”, is a fundamental tenet of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Here’s a summary of the content of the Jews’ Protocols provided on the Web …

Quote:

“Goyim are mentally inferior to Jews and can’t run their nations properly.  For their sake and ours, we need to abolish their governments and replace them with a single government.  This will take a long time and involve much bloodshed, but it’s for a good cause.  Here’s what we’ll need to do:

• Place our agents and helpers everywhere
• Take control of the media and use it in propaganda for our plans
• Start fights between different races, classes and religions
• Use bribery, threats and blackmail to get our way
• Use Freemasonic Lodges to attract potential public officials
• Appeal to successful people’s egos
• Appoint puppet leaders who can be controlled by blackmail
• Replace royal rule with socialist rule, then communism, then despotism
• Abolish all rights and freedoms, except the right of force by us
• Sacrifice people (including Jews sometimes) when necessary
• Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism
• Control the education system to spread deception and destroy intellect
• Rewrite history to our benefit
• Create entertaining distractions
• Corrupt minds with filth and perversion
• Encourage people to spy on one another
• Keep the masses in poverty and perpetual labor
• Take possession of all wealth, property and (especially) gold
• Use gold to manipulate the markets, cause depressions etc.
• Introduce a progressive tax on wealth
• Replace sound investment with speculation
• Make long-term interest-bearing loans to governments
• Give bad advice to governments and everyone else

Eventually the Goyim will be so angry with their governments (because we’ll blame them for the resulting mess) that they’ll gladly have us take over.  We will then appoint a descendant of David to be King of the World, and the remaining Goyim will bow down and sing his praises.  Everyone will live in peace and obedient order under his glorious rule.”

End quote.

It is true that all Jews may not endorse the Protocols; but lets face it, all Jews and their acolytes are implicated in what the elite Jews have done that’s consistent with them; because they’ve all had some knowledge that Jews are perpetrating crimes of that sort, and have either helped the Jewish cause or at least remained silent about the atrocity of it.

In conclusion it’s thought appropriate to consolidate what has been written by quoting the following:

“The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.” –Henry Ford, 2-17-21, whose newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, cited the Protocols as evidence of an alleged Jewish threat until at least 1927.

“To what extent the whole existence of this people [the Jews] is based on a continuous lie is shown incomparably by the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion….” –Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf.