Is the Jews' Haman doll smashed on Purim really a voodoo doll?

French President Nicolas Sarkozy recently threatened to sue a publishing company if it didn’t withdraw from shops a “voodoo doll” made in his image. The doll comes complete with pins and an instruction manual showing how to put the hex of the evil eye on the president. Users can even stick pins provided into certain choice quotes from Sarkozy printed on the doll.

Are Jews like Sarkozy paranoid about the use of voodoo dolls because they know Jews use rites of that sort to destroy Christians and Gentiles?

Jewish informer Myron Fagan proved that Ronald Reagan was in the pay of the Jews and a blatant communist while in Hollywood circles before his election to the presidency; and how much did George W. Bush know about the Jews’ control of economic policies in America and their pagan rites when he condemned Reaganomics as “Voodoo Economics”?

Did Jews put in Obama and put down Hilary Clinton not just by the power of their election campaign money but also by calling on the more Orthodox among them to use cabbalistic curses of the voodoo sort, and in a manner similar to the way some Jews believe Ariel Sharon and Yitzhak Rabin were removed from office by the pulsa d’nura or cabbalistic death curse?

Jews have an innate distrust and often an irrational hatred for Gentiles, because of the way Jewish history in the Old Testament is read to them by their rabbis who interpret it to shut out the gospel of Jesus Christ; and hence it’s no marvel that they’ve invented rites for their Purim festival that focus on burning images of Gentiles in effigy, and make Haman’s Ears cookies to chew on while watching puppet shows showing Haman the wicked Gentile getting hanged, and even make Haman Dolls, which are admittedly not pricked with pins like a voodoo doll but are smashed with hammers instead!

Haman's ears cookies prepared by Jews for chewing on Purim

Is the repetative cursing and chanting associated with reciting the Megillah scroll, accompanied by the racket of groggers or noisemakers, in the Jews’ rite of Purim, which includes getting boozed on Vodka, any different from the tribal chanting and dancing that accompanies the voodoo rites and the curses of the spirit-filled witchdoctors in pagan lands?

To quote one source: “In most Synagogues the reading of the Scroll of Esther (Megillat Esther) on Purim occurs in a rowdy, festive setting. Children and adults appear in a wide variety of costumes, merry making abounds, and groggers and other noisemakers fill the air after Haman’s name is read aloud. In today’s world, elaborate noise making devices have been constructed to supplement the sound of the grogger. Some communities play appropriate clips from movies every time Haman’s name is mentioned. Others use more simple instruments, like whistles or use pins to pop balloons [voodoo connotations?].

“What is the origin and meaning of this custom? Hayyim Schauss in his classic work, The Jewish Festivals (New York, 1938) asserts (p. 265), “The beating and noise of Purim originally had nothing to do with Haman; it comes from ancient times, when Purim was still a nature festival, bound up with the passing of winter and the approach of spring. It is an ancient belief with people that at the time when the seasons change the evil spirits have great power and strive to do mischief to all. One of the surest safeguards against the spirits was noise.”

“In contrast, R. Moses Isserles (16th c. Poland) suggests a more traditional explanation for this custom, which derives from the notion that Haman descends from the wicked tribe of Amalek. In a gloss to the Shulkhan Aukh, (Orakh Hayyim, 690) he writes, “Children have the custom of drawing images of Haman on wood and stones, or writing the name, “Haman”, upon them, and then banging the two objects together in order to erase Haman. This accords with the verses, ‘You must obliterate any mention of Amalek’ (Deuteronomy 25: 19), and ‘Let the names of the wicked rot’ (Proverbs 10: 7).

“From this evolved the custom of banging Haman during the reading of the Megillah. No custom should be nullified, because it was surely established for a reason.” These two suggestions differ significantly in approach, and yet they share the fact that both minimize the importance of the custom. Schauss suggests that the custom is a relic of a superstitious past.”

more about “Megilah reading at Hilel/Chabad UT Pu…“, posted with vodpod

Jesus Christ was condemned by the Pharisees because he denounced them for their “vain repetitions” in prayers and for thinking like the pagans that they will be heard for all of the performance of it, and for the noise they made when praying publicly to draw attention to themselves – like blowing a trumpet, which could be construed as having a counterpart in the use of groggers or noisemakers by Jews on Purim, because Purim has repetative rites involving praying, chanting and noisemaking.

The Jews’ notorious cabbalistic curse (ancient Aramiac fire curse) of the pulsa d’nura was brought to the attention of Gentiles, when it was used by the Kahane fanatic Yosef Dayan (presently the Jews’ leading candidate for the office of ‘Davidic’ king of Israel) on two of Israel’s now deceased prime ministers, Ariel Sharon and Yitzhak Rabin. The pulsa d’nura  has been cited by researchers as the Jews’ equivalent of cursing Haman on Purim; and it appears to have a lot in common with a pagan voodoo hex, especially since it’s used by some of the Jews to kill off their enemies under the banner of the hexagram or Magen David, which has pagan connotations and is widely used in occult ritual for conjuring demons.

In this video, vindictive Jews invoke the pulsa d’nura on Ariel Sharon because he ‘deported’ 10,000 Jews from their homes in Gaza in 2005 …

more about “Kabbalistic Pulsa d’Nura curse on Ari…“, posted with vodpod

In 1993, the wicked Santeria Church of Lukumi Babalu Ave successfully sued the city of Hialeah, FL, for the right to practise animal sacrifice. Prosecutors said the city had enacted ordinances forbidding the ritual slaughter of chickens, but the court determined that the ordinances were unconstitutional, because they directly contradicted the First Amendment.

Earlier in 2008, more than a dozen dead chickens were found dumped on North Beach, Nueces County, Texas; and the local DA considered filing animal cruelty charges against the perpetrators after police officers had said it was evidence of West African Santerian ritual, which would not have had a recognized defense under the First Ammendment in Texas.

In Santerian ritual the blood of chickens is offered to pagan gods and the birds cooked and eaten, but these birds were discarded after being sacrificed, which raises the question as to whether chooks of this sort have sometimes been used in the Jew’s callous and cruel kaparot ceremony, which likewise could be prosecuted as animal cruelty, and may also not have a recognized defense under the First Ammendment in Texas, even if that could be sought in the US Supreme Court.

more about “CHICKEN HOLOCAUST!!!: PETA video Kapp…“, posted with vodpod

In fact it may well be asked, just what is the difference between Santerians sacrificing chickens and the Jews’ Kaparot ceremony, which involves swinging a chook three times around the head of a Jew, and then cutting its throat to drain the blood?

The similarity between the two ordinances is obvious in the following videos; the first showing the Jews’ kaparot ceremony and the second a shamanistic fertility rite …

The Jews’ religion of so-called Judaism is the religion of the ancient Pharisees and hence has little in common with the religion of Moses given to the Israelites and even less to do with the religion of Jesus Christ when here on earth in the flesh incarnate; and because it’s diametrically opposite to Christianity it can hardly be anything less than pagan and is indeed satanic.