Jewish infant's genitals prepared for oral contact with Jewish surgeon in rite of circumcision

Jewish surgeon sucks blood from wounded penis in rite of circumcision

According to an article posted by the Holocaust Historiography Project, which is endorsed by the Jews’ sacred literature, the Talmud …

“The subject of sex has been a focus for Jewish writers since Biblical times. The Babylonian Talmud, which is the legal code that forms the basis of Jewish regulations, contains many references to sexual mores and commentaries. Many of these regulations are perverse. For example, Yebhamoth 55b permits sexual intercourse with a dead relative, whether the relative was single or married. Kethuboth 11b advocates sex with three year old girls. Sanhedrin 54b-55a permits sodomy with three year old girls and boys under nine. 78a of the same book allows sodomy with a dying person, but only so long as the act is committed in the presence of a rabbi!

Lengthy debates take place within the holy books about whether or not consummation of a marriage on the Sabbath would constitute work. The law-makers conclude that such intercourse is not work and is permissible because “any act of damage does not constitute labor in regard to the Sabbath”!

Even Jesus is included in these bizarre sexual ramblings. Sanhedrin 105a-b tells that “Jesus fornicated with his jackass”. And Gittin 57a holds that “Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in shit.”

In the light of the foregoing, it should be no marvel to find that, since the Crucifixion, the Jews have moved away from the singular biblical Abrahamic rite of male circumcision into a horribly depraved pagan rite of male circumcision, which is arguably a form of sadism, homosexuality, paedophilia, and oral sex, involving calling upon a mohel or Jewish surgeon to not only cut away the foreskin but to with that repetatively orally suck blood from the wounded penis!

The Jewish Encyclopedia endorses the foregoing under the subheading of circumcision, where it cites the third stage of Jewish ritual circumcision as mezizah, and specifies that the mohel ‘takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part [i.e., penis] involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided for the purpose. This procedure is repeated several times, and completes the operation.’

The rite of mezizah or orally sucking blood from a wounded penis was doubtless brought over into the religion of so-called Judaism by the Eastern European Khazars who practised phallic worship before their conversion en masse to the Jews’ religion in the middle of the 8th century. For the commentaries on the Mishnah of the Talmud that are the basis of the rite of mezizah were written by rabbis of the Eastern European Ashkenazim who were predominantly of Khazar ethnicity.

Did the Jews' rite of Mezizah provide some of the inspiration for this work by Gustave Dore, titled "Isaac blesses Jacob"?

The Jews’ repugnant rite of mezizah is mandatory, and the Talmud says any mohel who fails to perform it must be removed from office. Mezizah is still widely practised, but has been dispensed with or modified by some rabbis because of the risk of the infant contracting diseases from the mouth of the mohel. To quote a practising mohelet Lonnie Morris (2002), ‘Little old men used to come to your home and suck the blood out of the penis with their mouths. Then they started using a glass tube. They thought if they took the blood out it would bleed less and feel better. Because of AIDS, they stopped doing things like that’!

The corrupt pagan rite of Jewish male ritual circumcision can probably also be construed as a form of sexual bondage, not simply because the Jews present will physically constrain some of the older males to be circumcised, as shown in the image below; but also because having one’s penis fellated by a mohel doubtless brings the circumcised Jew into bondage to rabbinical authority in a subliminal way, and in a manner similar to the way Roman Catholics have been brought subliminally into bondage to the papacy’s priestcraft, by first confessing lewd sexual things to a priest in the Confessional.

Jews hold down naked youth while the mohel stimulates and circumcises the penis, before orally sucking the blood from it

The foregoing thesis would be generally consistent with the fact that the Pharisees at the time of Christ, who were the prototypes of the Talmudic rabbis in Jewry who concocted the rite of mezizah, practised a particularly perverse revision of the Old Testament priestly rite of trying a woman for adultery. For a jealous husband had to bring his wife to the Sanhedrin; and if she admitted being unfaithful, she was immediately divorced and lost her conjugal property rights. However if she denied the charge she was ‘taken to the East Gate of the Temple, in front of the Nicanor Gate, and placed in charge of a priest who rent her garment so that her breast was exposed and loosened her hair: she was draped in black; all ornaments were removed from her person, and a rope was tied around her chest. Thus publicly exposed (only her servants being prevented from seeing her), the jealousy offering was placed in her hands.’

For unsurprisingly the foregoing Pharisaical rite deviates significantly from the righteous biblical ordinance practised by Jehovah’s Levitical priest who uncovered the head but not the breast of the woman; and it also has patent sadistic overtones, and indicates that the Pharisees derived considerable pleasure from viewing and participating in sexual bondage.

The Holocaust Historiography Project at http://www.historiography-project.com/books/exiles/08sex.html has this to say about Jewish ritual circumcision …

“Jews are even saddled with the sin of masturbatiomania, owing to Gentile observance of the mohel, or circumciser, routinely clasping the babe’s penis with thumb and forefinger and gently stimulating an erection to facilitate the delicate operation; and are heavily burdened with the terrible guilt of being fellatio maniacs: a scandal aroused by Gentile observation of the circumcisional routine of metzizah, or stypic suction of the wound by the circumciser’s wine-daubed lips — a highly controversial procedure suggestive of Jewish perversion as well as explanatory of alleged Jewish addiction to fellation. Freudian theories of sexual traumatism were thus afloat in an earlier age!”

And this …

“Let us draw together some of the various findings we have uncovered. We have found that Jewish religious literature dwells on perverse sex. We discover that in the modern age, Jews are still practicing weird sex cults, such as circumcision and the rejection of a menstruating wife. We have found that rabbis will masturbate, then mutilate and then fellate a baby’s penis …

Our conclusion must be as follows: Jews suffer from an inadequacy and hatred of themselves which is stimulated by maternal punitiveness, and manifests itself as filial guilt. Fathers exercise their guilt and shame at being Jewish by performing a token castration of their male children; circumcision. But at the same time they try to make amends to the infant by kissing/fellating his mutilated penis. Resentment against Jewish mothers is transposed onto Jewish wives by rejecting them during their most feminine period. The Jewish wives react by themselves becoming punitive against the males in the family. So the vicious cycle continues.”

Considerable opposition to mezizah has arisen in recent years because of its obvious clash with the intended aseptic character of the overall operation. Innovations are sometimes applied to avoid direct contact of the mohel’s mouth with the wounded penis, such as the sucking of the blood through a glass cylinder with a compressed mouthpiece or through a piece of absorbent cotton. The Talmud says: ‘We [Jews] perform all the requirements of circumcision on the sabbath. We circumcise, uncover [the corona], [orally] suck [the wound], and place a compress and cumin upon it.’—Shabbath 133a.

Leading Russian (Lithuanian) rabbis have recently stressed that wiping the wound with a sponge or sucking it through cotton in mezizah is prohibited and that the rite must be done by direct oral contact. The Jewish Encyclopedia (1906) acknowledges that mezizah runs contrary to the principle of antiseptic treatment of wounds, and says a “large number” of Jewish children have contracted syphilis from the mohel’s mouth.

In February 2006, the New York Health Commissioner confirmed that mezizah “has and can cause neonatal herpes infection”, and stressed that the Health Department recommends that the practice should cease forthwith.

Some Jewish authorities say post-mezizah benedictions have been recited “with the blood still present on the mouth”, e.g., in Modena, circa 1805; and they cite a Polish rabbi who preferred to blow the shofar on Rosh Hashanah with his mouth “dirtied by the blood of circumcision”; and both of those rites could be construed as having perverse sexual connotations.

more about “Speechless – Jewish Circumcision“, posted with vodpod

A male born without a foreskin, or a male convert to Talmudism who has been circumcised outside of Judaism, must have a drop of blood drawn from his penis (hatafas dam brit) instead of suffering the rite of circumcision. Drawing a drop of blood from the wounded penis of a convert to the evil religion of Talmudic Judaism not only has perverse sexual connotations but is also remarkably similar to the rite of drawing a drop of blood from an initiate into rank Satanism. This should, however, not be surprising, because so-called Judaism is exemplified by the hexagonal Magen David and the pentagram of the Seal of Solomon, both of which are used for conjuring demons in the rites of witchcraft and diabolism.

---

---

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

• Deep Studies
• The Benefits of Oral Sex